tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4558409694297595460.post-73802619518641504772008-05-04T18:27:00.000-04:002008-05-04T18:27:00.000-04:00Alex,<BR/><BR/>I read the script for the first time. Initially, I felt like you. But then a counter-point came to mind.<BR/><BR/>This may be the ticket to keep notaries out of the line of fire. (That is, out of the line of fire who want to see signing appointments shifted back inside of the brick/mortar title company or inside the attorney's office.)<BR/><BR/>I think this will empower the notary to have and provide the answers without stepping outside of their boundaries or not saying enough thereby becoming obsolete due to those who would have the notary licensed. With the script there is only one way to say it and here it is.<BR/><BR/>Yes, it is tedious. However, I think just like we (who wanted to be the "best" at what we do/did) all developed our own scripts this is an adaption that leaves no stone unturned and nothing left to the creative imagination of some of the uninformed notaries who have made this script necessary. <BR/><BR/>Again, tedious? Yes. But possibly the means to save the signing agent.texnotaryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09983856365674269965noreply@blogger.com