tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4558409694297595460.post2356481280916377396..comments2023-07-25T11:48:08.974-04:00Comments on Detroit Mobile Notary Signing Agent Blog - Notary Tips & News: It's True Because The National Notary Association Says It's TrueUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4558409694297595460.post-78449442445467683452015-09-16T02:36:23.248-04:002015-09-16T02:36:23.248-04:00I have bookmarked this website and I will keep vis...I have bookmarked this website and I will keep visiting you for further such interesting posts.<br /><br /><a href="Furnace%20Repair%20Salt%20lake%20City%20Utah" rel="nofollow">http://www.leesheatac.com/heating/</a>latestgeneralnewshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12238490716970790774noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4558409694297595460.post-42422681151152372032015-02-18T16:02:15.646-05:002015-02-18T16:02:15.646-05:00First of all, we're not talking about a "...First of all, we're not talking about a "legal instrument." We're not specifically talking about a mortgage or deed. We're talking about notarizing signatures on ANY document. Don't get being a notary mixed up with being a signing agent that handles mortgages. There is no such rule that states more is OK but not less. And if there's a "confirmed rule" that a name can't be used in a modified form, than more is not acceptable either because that's still a modification, isn't it? <br /><br />I've read every federal statute related to notarization. No such rule exists, and no one has ever been able to produce this rule in any statute. This "rule" came courtesy of the convoluted mess that is California, where they make things up as they go along. <br /><br />As far as legal instruments, that is determined by the recording requirements of each state. There's no such federal rule. <br /><br /> But go ahead, show me a notary statute that says more is OK but less isn't. and don't just quote an organization. Show the statute.Alex Y.https://www.blogger.com/profile/09922906727499303111noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4558409694297595460.post-38335303102069752015-02-18T15:32:57.992-05:002015-02-18T15:32:57.992-05:00That is a confirmed rule taking the fact into cons...That is a confirmed rule taking the fact into consideration that a name cant be used in a modified form in a legal instrument.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09748766276667384280noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4558409694297595460.post-72941428673001939472012-07-04T22:06:12.078-04:002012-07-04T22:06:12.078-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.LaShon James-Majorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09032133967331328231noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4558409694297595460.post-32378314243436798492012-07-04T22:06:09.840-04:002012-07-04T22:06:09.840-04:00You make a good point. Sometimes statements are ta...You make a good point. Sometimes statements are taken as fact without being proven.<br /><br />Thanks for the reminder.LaShon James-Majorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09032133967331328231noreply@blogger.com